When the animals lost federal protection just 15 months ago, wolf hunting spiked in some states. The recent ruling protects wolves in 44 of the lower 48 states but does not directly impact wolves in the northern Rocky Mountains of Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming as well as portions of several nearby states. ![]() “The Fish and Wildlife Service should be ashamed of defending the gray wolf delisting.” “Wolves need federal protection, period,” says Kristen Boyles, an attorney at Earthjustice, says to Catrin Einhorn of the New York Times. The Biden administration now has 60 days to decide whether to appeal the ruling. ![]() Fish and Wildlife Service "failed to adequately analyze and consider the impacts of partial delisting and of historical range loss on the already-listed species.”Īttorneys for the Biden administration defended the 2020 decision to remove protections for gray wolves, arguing the species’ populations were resilient enough to recover from hunting, Matthew Brown and John Flesher report for the Associated Press. In late 2020, the Trump administration removed gray wolves from the endangered list and stripped their legal protections, citing “the successful recovery of the gray wolf.” The decision was reversed last Thursday by U.S. The decision to re-list gray wolves is being hailed as a major conservation victory for the species, which is frequently embroiled in controversy between scientists, hunters and ranchers. ![]() Federal protection for gray wolves has been restored in most of the lower 48 United States.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |